Every screen, every field, and what the answer means
Preceptor is a study tool. You work through teaching cases, or write one yourself, and you get back the reasoning a good clinician would use — not just an answer, but why that answer and why not the others.
Never type a real patient's details. Not a name, not a hospital number, not a date of birth. The cases are fictional, and that is what keeps this a teaching tool rather than a medical device. It is also why the answers can be complete: a textbook prints the full regimen because the patient in it does not exist.

The region is not a language setting. It decides WHICH guidelines the answers are held to — a chest pain worked up against NICE reads differently from the same case against the ESC or the DGS, and someone revising for a Portuguese exam should not be quietly marked against British thresholds.
It is asked on first launch and you can change it any time — from the selector at the top of a case, or from Account. When your country's corpus has nothing on a topic the app widens the search: Portugal falls back to European guidance, then international, and the answer tells you which tier it used.
Ready-made teaching cases with multiple-choice questions. This is the free, unlimited part of the app: opening one costs nothing from your daily allowance, because the answers were written once and are stored.



Progress is kept on the device. Sign in and it follows you between phone and browser, merged by the best result you have had on each case — so running a case again on another device never lowers a score you already earned.
This is where you write a case yourself and get a full worked answer. Before the fields, you choose where the case takes place — and that choice changes what the answer contains, not just its tone.

The teaching payload — pathophysiology, how the differential was reasoned, learning points and pitfalls — comes back in EVERY setting. The setting says where the case happens; it never decides whether you get taught.
Four steps, and a button that tells you exactly what is still missing. Fields marked with an asterisk are required — the rest change the answer when you fill them, and are simply absent from it when you do not.




Paste results as text, or upload a report. When labs are present the answer adds a section naming which values are abnormal and interpreting them together rather than one by one — and it shows its reasoning steps, which is the part worth reading twice.
The last thing before the button is a checkbox accepting the limitations. It is not decoration and it is not skippable: the button stays disabled until it is ticked, and the line underneath lists everything still missing.
The answer always comes back in the same order, so you learn where to look. Here is what each part is claiming.
A citation with a warning triangle could not be matched against the guidelines bundled with the app. It is not automatically wrong — the corpus is a selection, not the literature — but it is unverified, and it is the one thing in an answer you should not repeat in an exam without checking the source yourself.


It shows the arithmetic, not just the number: the rule it used, the figures it put into that rule, and the adjustments for weight and kidney function. That is the point — a dose you cannot derive is a dose you cannot check.
When an adjustment cannot be made because something is missing, the figure is withheld rather than guessed. A number with a caveat gets copied; a missing number gets questioned.
